International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Phytopharmacological Research
ISSN (Print): 2250-1029
ISSN (Online): 2249-6084
Publish with eIJPPR Submission
2026   Volume 16   Issue 1

Molecular Foundation Models for Phytochemical Space: Encoding Natural Product Structure, Bioactivity, Target Context, and Therapeutic Potential
Download PDF


, ,
  1. Department of AI for Amazonian Shamanic Plant Extracts, Faculty of Pharmacy, National University of Colombia, Bogota, Colombia.
  2. Department of Computational Biophysics of Peptide Toxins, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Citation
Vancouver
Alvarez M, Herrera S, Cruz D. Molecular Foundation Models for Phytochemical Space: Encoding Natural Product Structure, Bioactivity, Target Context, and Therapeutic Potential. Int J Pharm Phytopharmacol Res. 2026;16(1):71-87. https://doi.org/10.51847/nk0XqwaEWk
APA
Alvarez, M., Herrera, S., & Cruz, D. (2026). Molecular Foundation Models for Phytochemical Space: Encoding Natural Product Structure, Bioactivity, Target Context, and Therapeutic Potential. International Journal of Pharmaceutical And Phytopharmacological Research, 16(1), 71-87. https://doi.org/10.51847/nk0XqwaEWk
Download citation:   EndNote   RIS
Article Link:
Downloads: 29
Views: 119
Abstract

Molecular foundation models are emerging as general-purpose representation systems for chemical and biological prediction, yet phytochemical space remains poorly served by models trained mainly on generic small-molecule data. This article proposes a conceptual framework for molecular foundation models designed specifically to represent natural product complexity without converting computational predictions into unsupported therapeutic claims. The framework organizes phytochemical information across identity, source, chemical structure, stereochemistry, scaffold architecture, biosynthetic context, molecular graphs, molecular language, three-dimensional information where supported, bioactivity evidence, assay context, target and pathway relationships, safety signals, provenance, data quality, and uncertainty. It distinguishes representation learning from evidence interpretation by separating pretraining, transfer learning, multimodal integration, and fine-tuning from the validation steps required to establish bioactivity, target engagement, safety, or therapeutic usefulness. Target-context encoding is positioned as a means of generating testable hypotheses and prioritizing experiments, while therapeutic potential is treated as a bounded research construct rather than a model-confirmed property. The proposed design requirements emphasize natural product-aware training data, stereochemistry-sensitive encoders, assay-aware labels, provenance tracking, calibrated uncertainty, bias assessment, external validation, experimental confirmation, expert curation, and transparent reporting. The main contribution is an original, evidence-grounded architecture for aligning molecular foundation model development with the distinctive informational structure of phytochemical space and with responsible translational interpretation.

Related articles:
Most viewed articles:
Naproxen in Pain and Inflammation – A Review
Vol 11 Issue 1, 2021 | Svetoslav Nikolaev Stoev
An Overview on Emulgel
Vol 9 Issue 1, 2019 | Sreevidya V.S
Volume 16
Issue 4
2026

Call for Papers
[email protected]
Issues
Associations
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2026 International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Phytopharmacological Research
Authors retain copyright of their article if they are accepted for publication.