International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Phytopharmacological Research
ISSN (Print): 2250-1029
ISSN (Online): 2249-6084
Publish with eIJPPR Submission
2026   Volume 16   Issue 4

Model the Therapeutic Microenvironment Before Optimizing the Natural Product Lead Across Oxygenation, Matrix Properties, Cellular Crosstalk, Metabolism, and Local Drug Exposure
Download PDF


, , ,
  1. Department of Therapeutic Microenvironment Modeling, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  2. Department of Oxygenation and Matrix Properties in Drug Design, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
  3. Department of Cellular Crosstalk and Local Drug Exposure, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Citation
Vancouver
Ramirez C, Torres E, Ortega P, Mendes S. Model the Therapeutic Microenvironment Before Optimizing the Natural Product Lead Across Oxygenation, Matrix Properties, Cellular Crosstalk, Metabolism, and Local Drug Exposure. Int J Pharm Phytopharmacol Res. 2026;16(4):1-9. https://doi.org/10.51847/cAtg9FGEh2
APA
Ramirez, C., Torres, E., Ortega, P., & Mendes, S. (2026). Model the Therapeutic Microenvironment Before Optimizing the Natural Product Lead Across Oxygenation, Matrix Properties, Cellular Crosstalk, Metabolism, and Local Drug Exposure. International Journal of Pharmaceutical And Phytopharmacological Research, 16(4), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.51847/cAtg9FGEh2
Download citation:   EndNote   RIS
Article Link:
Downloads: 20
Views: 71
Abstract

Natural-product lead optimization commonly treats potency, selectivity, and chemical developability as properties of the candidate while treating the biological environment as background. Yet therapeutic activity is expressed within tissues whose oxygenation, redox state, extracellular matrix, cellular composition, local metabolism, and drug distribution can differ markedly from the conditions used for primary screening. This conceptual framework argues that such differences should be represented as pharmacological state variables when they are capable of changing a lead-selection decision. Evidence from cancer pharmacology shows that hypoxia can alter drug vulnerability, extracellular-matrix mechanics can reshape signaling and resistance, stromal signals can modify target dependence, local metabolic systems can transform therapeutic molecules, and spatially heterogeneous exposure can separate nominal dose from tissue-level pharmacology. The proposed therapeutic-microenvironment framework therefore treats lead performance as conditional on a set of plausible biological states rather than as a single potency value obtained under one reference condition. It further distinguishes evidence-supported environmental mechanisms from proposed integration, measured exposure from inferred target engagement, and biological complexity from model complexity. The intended use is not to maximize experimental realism, but to identify when environmental dimensions are sufficiently plausible, measurable, and decision-relevant to justify inclusion during optimization. The framework remains oncology-dominant, non-validated as an integrated ranking system, and unsuitable for assuming universal microenvironmental effects across natural products, diseases, or treatment mechanisms without direct testing.

Related articles:
Most viewed articles:
Naproxen in Pain and Inflammation – A Review
Vol 11 Issue 1, 2021 | Svetoslav Nikolaev Stoev
An Overview on Emulgel
Vol 9 Issue 1, 2019 | Sreevidya V.S
Volume 17
Issue 1
2027

Call for Papers
[email protected]
Issues
Associations
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).

Copyright © 2026 International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Phytopharmacological Research
Authors retain copyright of their article if they are accepted for publication.