International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Phytopharmacological Research
ISSN (Print): 2250-1029
ISSN (Online): 2249-6084
Publish with eIJPPR Submission
2025   Volume 15   Issue 6

Strategic Pathways for AI-Enabled Phytopharmaceutical Translation: Data Infrastructure, Model Validation, Mechanistic Evidence, Regulatory Alignment, and Clinical Adoption
Download PDF


, ,
  1. Department of AI for Wound-Healing Phytochemicals, School of Pharmacy, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
  2. Department of Cheminformatics for Terpenoid Therapeutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Citation
Vancouver
O'Connor P, Murphy G, Walsh N. Strategic Pathways for AI-Enabled Phytopharmaceutical Translation: Data Infrastructure, Model Validation, Mechanistic Evidence, Regulatory Alignment, and Clinical Adoption. Int J Pharm Phytopharmacol Res. 2025;15(6):82-94. https://doi.org/10.51847/Uhoi8qzyOj
APA
O'Connor, P., Murphy, G., & Walsh, N. (2025). Strategic Pathways for AI-Enabled Phytopharmaceutical Translation: Data Infrastructure, Model Validation, Mechanistic Evidence, Regulatory Alignment, and Clinical Adoption. International Journal of Pharmaceutical And Phytopharmacological Research, 15(6), 82-94. https://doi.org/10.51847/Uhoi8qzyOj
Download citation:   EndNote   RIS
Article Link:
Downloads: 26
Views: 83
Abstract

AI-enabled phytopharmaceutical translation is emerging at the intersection of natural product research, computational pharmacology, translational science, regulatory interpretation, and responsible clinical innovation. Although artificial intelligence may support compound prioritisation, target prediction, evidence integration, and safety-aware hypothesis generation, translation requires more than predictive performance. This original strategic roadmap article proposes a staged framework for moving AI-enabled phytopharmaceutical evidence from discovery-oriented outputs toward responsible translational planning. The roadmap emphasises interoperable data infrastructure, FAIR chemical and biological records, provenance, natural product identity, chemical annotation, bioactivity evidence, safety data, and clinical evidence traceability. It further defines model validation requirements, including internal testing, external validation, benchmarking, uncertainty communication, explainability, bias assessment, and generalisability. Mechanistic evidence is positioned as a plausibility layer requiring target evidence, pathway evidence, experimental validation, exposure relevance, ADMET interpretation, and safety validation, while regulatory alignment is framed as evidence-to-claim mapping rather than approval. Clinical adoption is treated as a later-stage pathway requiring workflow fit, clinician trust, human oversight, patient safety safeguards, implementation monitoring, and pharmacovigilance readiness. The main contribution is a structured strategic roadmap that links data readiness, model credibility, mechanistic plausibility, safety interpretation, regulatory logic, clinical workflow integration, governance safeguards, and continuous evidence updating while avoiding claims of clinical readiness without appropriate validation.

Related articles:
Most viewed articles:
Naproxen in Pain and Inflammation – A Review
Vol 11 Issue 1, 2021 | Svetoslav Nikolaev Stoev
An Overview on Emulgel
Vol 9 Issue 1, 2019 | Sreevidya V.S
Volume 16
Issue 1
2026

Call for Papers
[email protected]
Issues
Associations
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2026 International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Phytopharmacological Research
Authors retain copyright of their article if they are accepted for publication.