International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Phytopharmacological Research
ISSN (Print): 2250-1029
ISSN (Online): 2249-6084
Publish with eIJPPR Submission
2025   Volume 15   Issue 4

From Misassigned Structures to Misleading Models: How Structural Annotation Errors Propagate Through Natural Product Informatics and Computational Pharmacology
Download PDF


, ,
  1. Department of Structural Annotation and Error Propagation, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia.
  2. Department of Natural Product Informatics and Model Reliability, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia.
Citation
Vancouver
Ben Ali A, Gharbi S, Jebali N. From Misassigned Structures to Misleading Models: How Structural Annotation Errors Propagate Through Natural Product Informatics and Computational Pharmacology. Int J Pharm Phytopharmacol Res. 2025;15(4):85-93. https://doi.org/10.51847/IOjlLj8ndu
APA
Ben Ali, A., Gharbi, S., & Jebali, N. (2025). From Misassigned Structures to Misleading Models: How Structural Annotation Errors Propagate Through Natural Product Informatics and Computational Pharmacology. International Journal of Pharmaceutical And Phytopharmacological Research, 15(4), 85-93. https://doi.org/10.51847/IOjlLj8ndu
Download citation:   EndNote   RIS
Article Link:
Downloads: 20
Views: 74
Abstract

Natural‑product informatics often treats a molecular structure as a stable input, yet the structure itself may remain an evidential claim. A misassigned constitution, configuration, regiochemistry, or molecular state can therefore enter databases and computational workflows before any model is fitted, scored, or validated. This methodological framework examines structural annotation error as an upstream modeling hazard and distinguishes experimental structure assignment from database standardization, molecular‑state preparation, descriptor generation, docking, similarity analysis, and machine‑learning prediction. Evidence from natural‑product structure revision, chemical database curation, stereochemical representation, docking benchmarks, and molecular machine learning is integrated to identify where structural uncertainty can be introduced, transformed, or hidden. The article proposes a structural‑provenance framework in which computational reuse is conditioned on traceable assignment evidence, explicit representation policy, state specification, versioned correction, and model‑sensitivity analysis. The framework does not assume that every alternative tautomer, protomer, stereoisomer, or database representation is erroneous; rather, it separates genuine assignment error from legitimate molecular multiplicity and deliberate harmonization choices. It further distinguishes chemical‑identity confidence from predictive uncertainty and numerical model confidence. The principal implication is methodological: model validation cannot compensate for an unexamined molecular identity claim when the model consumes that claim as data. The proposed framework is not a validated quality standard and does not establish the prevalence or quantitative effect of misassigned natural products in current computational datasets. Prospective testing with paired corrected and uncorrected structures is required.

Related articles:
Most viewed articles:
Naproxen in Pain and Inflammation – A Review
Vol 11 Issue 1, 2021 | Svetoslav Nikolaev Stoev
An Overview on Emulgel
Vol 9 Issue 1, 2019 | Sreevidya V.S
Volume 16
Issue 4
2026

Call for Papers
[email protected]
Issues
Associations
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).

Copyright © 2026 International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Phytopharmacological Research
Authors retain copyright of their article if they are accepted for publication.