International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Phytopharmacological Research
ISSN (Print): 2250-1029
ISSN (Online): 2249-6084
Publish with eIJPPR Submission
2025   Volume 15   Issue 1

Computational Pharmacology Meets Phytopharmacology: A Scoping Review of Network-Based, Structure-Based, and Omics-Driven Discovery Strategies
Download PDF


, ,
  1. Department of Phytochemistry and Machine Learning for Bioactive Compounds, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
  2. Department of AI-Driven Drug Design and Herbal Medicine, Faculty of Chemistry and Pharmacy, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Citation
Vancouver
Müller H, Schmidt A, Weber T. Computational Pharmacology Meets Phytopharmacology: A Scoping Review of Network-Based, Structure-Based, and Omics-Driven Discovery Strategies. Int J Pharm Phytopharmacol Res. 2025;15(1):36-46. https://doi.org/10.51847/HRHdiG8e0e
APA
Müller, H., Schmidt, A., & Weber, T. (2025). Computational Pharmacology Meets Phytopharmacology: A Scoping Review of Network-Based, Structure-Based, and Omics-Driven Discovery Strategies. International Journal of Pharmaceutical And Phytopharmacological Research, 15(1), 36-46. https://doi.org/10.51847/HRHdiG8e0e
Download citation:   EndNote   RIS
Article Link:
Downloads: 26
Views: 63
Abstract

Computational pharmacology is increasingly reshaping phytopharmacology by enabling structured interpretation of medicinal plants, phytochemicals, botanical mixtures, molecular targets, biological pathways, and mechanism-oriented evidence. This scoping review maps how network-based computational pharmacology, structure-based phytochemical screening, and omics-driven mechanistic discovery are being used to support natural-product and phytopharmacological research. The review uses a scoping logic rather than an effectiveness-synthesis design, emphasizing evidence mapping, methodological classification, data-source transparency, validation practices, integration patterns, and research gaps. Network-based approaches are examined for their use in compound–target mapping, target prediction, disease-module analysis, protein–protein interaction networks, pathway enrichment, polypharmacology, and synergy hypothesis generation. Structure-based strategies are assessed for their roles in virtual screening, molecular docking, binding-mode assessment, molecular dynamics, pharmacophore modeling, QSAR where relevant, and ADMET prioritization. Omics-driven approaches are considered in relation to transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, multi-omics integration, response signatures, biomarker discovery, and mechanism-of-action inference. Across these domains, the review highlights that computational convergence can strengthen hypothesis prioritization but cannot independently establish pharmacological mechanism, therapeutic efficacy, safety, or clinical relevance. Major limitations include database dependency, target-prediction uncertainty, pathway redundancy, hub overinterpretation, structural-model assumptions, scoring-function limitations, omics confounding, incomplete validation, and weak reproducibility. The review contributes an integrated conceptual map for computational–experimental phytopharmacology and identifies future priorities centered on transparent workflows, uncertainty-aware inference, orthogonal validation, standardized botanical characterization, and translationally meaningful evidence integration.

Related articles:
Most viewed articles:
Naproxen in Pain and Inflammation – A Review
Vol 11 Issue 1, 2021 | Svetoslav Nikolaev Stoev
An Overview on Emulgel
Vol 9 Issue 1, 2019 | Sreevidya V.S
Volume 16
Issue 1
2026

Call for Papers
[email protected]
Issues
Associations
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2026 International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Phytopharmacological Research
Authors retain copyright of their article if they are accepted for publication.