Evaluating Coconut Oil and Coconut Water-Loaded Gels for the Alleviation of Chloroquine-Induced Pruritus |
Emmanuel Uronnachi1*, Onyinye Okpalaku1, Ebere Okoye1 |
|
1Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Anambra State, Nigeria. |
ABSTRACT
Coconut water and coconut oil were extracted from mature coconuts and their gels were formulated and characterized. Their anti-pruritic effect was evaluated. Seven batches of 1 % hydrogels were formulated from carbopol, and carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), singly and in combination. The formulations were administered to rats with Eurax® cream as the positive control. Pruritus was induced by subcutaneous injection of Chloroquine phosphate on 27 Wistar rats at a dose of 20 mg/kg subcutaneously, and an oral dose of 158 mg/kg. Itching bouts were counted. The formulations were mildly alkaline with pH ranging from (7.0 - 9.5). Viscosity values ranged from (201 mPas - 1890 mPas). The gels were more stable at 25 ± 2 ºC. Anti-pruritic evaluations showed that the animals treated with CMC + Carbopol gel containing coconut oil exhibited the least frequency of itching bouts, with sustained anti-pruritic activity. ANOVA showed statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) in results between Eurax® and the CMC + Carbopol gel containing coconut oil. There was no significant difference in anti-pruritic effects between the CMC + Carbopol gel containing either coconut oil or water. Coconut oil gels may easily be applied as a therapy in the management of itching resulting from drug-induced allergy.
Key Words: Coconut oil, Pruritis, Coconut water, Gels, Chloroquine
INTRODUCTION
Pruritus manifests as an unpleasant sensation urging one to scratch. As one of the most common clinical manifestations in medicine, it is divided into acute and chronic stages, based on the duration of the clinical manifestation. Furthermore, it may manifest clinically as an adverse reaction to an administered drug. Its pathogenesis may involve several cytokines and inflammatory neuro-mediators and usually involves the central and peripheral nervous system [1].
Drugs may cause itching as a concomitant symptom of drug-induced skin reactions or in the form of pruritus without skin lesions [2]. Chloroquine-induced pruritus has been reported as being more predominant in black-skinned people and people of negroid descent while administration of the drug to whites rarely elicits itching , thus suggesting a genetic pre-dispositon to the symptom [3]. Furthermore, in vitro skin cell studies showed that chloroquine preferentially binds to melanocytes as opposed to keratinocytes [4]. The non-histaminergic nature of CQ itch makes it a good model for probing the mechanisms of chronic itch.
There are striking similarities between CQ itching pathways and other forms of chronic itch. These include the shared roles of skin, kappa opiate receptor, nitric oxide, serotonin via 5HT1B/D receptors, neural and spinal μ opiate receptors, cytokines (especially interleukins), and tumor necrosis factor [5].
Two varieties of coconut oil exist: virgin and refined oil. Virgin coconut oil (VCO) is made by cold-pressing the liquid from the fresh part of coconut meat. It has a milky appearance. This method of oil extraction preserves the contents of vitamin E, pro-vitamin A, and polyphenols. Various properties of this oil have been reported as anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and anti-cancer [6]. Natural plant oils, due to their easy availability, accessibility, and low cost are most commonly used globally for treating various skin ailments [7, 8]. Coconut oil contains compounds that exhibit antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anti-pruritic actions making it an important, cost-effective, alternative, and complementary medicine to target various xerotic and inflammatory skin diseases in which the skin barrier is disrupted [9, 10].
CQ-induced pruritus has been an obstacle leading to poor compliance in patients [11]. Regardless of the route of administration, CQ is a major inducer of a very discomforting, generalized body itch within about 2 hours of administration. Chloroquine-induced itch is mostly independent of the route of administration as many patients are forced to stop further drug ingestion. This has led to poor patient compliance, CQ-induced resistance, increased cases of relapse, and an overall poor prognosis. Chloroquine-induced itching is often regarded as a characteristic ‘histamine-independent’ itch signaling pathway [12].
Several remedies for itching exist with varying degrees of efficacy [13]. Unfortunately, antihistamines are only effective if the itching (pruritus) is caused by histamine (as in urticaria). They only benefit non-histamine-mediated itch through their sedating tranquilizing properties [14].
Several substances have been shown to reduce the itching associated with chloroquine [15-18] while some other mechanisms have been discovered to ameliorate the itching associated with chloroquine use [19-21].
It has been reported that chlorpheniramine or hydroxyzine hydrochloride provided symptomatic relief [22].
Nwonu et al. [23] investigated the possibility of interaction upon concomitant administration of coconut fruit water and chloroquine sulfate in adult male rabbits. The results of the study demonstrated a strong interaction between coconut fruit water and chloroquine sulfate thus reducing its bio-availability. This oral administration is helpful for the management of drug toxicity. However, it can interfere with certain pharmacokinetic properties such as its volume of distribution, and plasma half-life in the process. There is a need for a dosage form that is less interfering with the drug’s pharmacokinetics. Choi et al. [12] reported that crotamiton inhibits both histamine- and chloroquine-dependent itch pathways and suppresses scratching behavior induced by both compounds in mice.
Coconut water and oil are already known to the population in their natural state as an age-long itch relief. There is a need for a natural pharmaceutical formulation that possesses: water solubility in external body fluids, cutaneous penetrability, cosmetic appeal (hair and skin), little or no pharmacokinetic interference, little or no adverse effects, ease of administration, sustained actions, safety, and physical stability.
Hydrogels have the ability to form three-dimensional polymer networks that are hydrophilic in nature and can absorb water to expand without dissolving. This makes them an attractive choice in drug delivery. Particularly, carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogels have attracted considerable research attention for the development of safe drug delivery carriers because of their non-toxicity, good biodegradability, good bio-compatibility, and low immunogenicity [24].
This study aims to formulate, characterize, and evaluate coconut water- and oil-loaded gels for their anti-pruritic activities on female Wister rats using the chloroquine-induced pruritus model in rats.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Materials
Plant materials
Mature coconuts (Cocos nucifera) used in this study were harvested in March, from a local herbalist farm in an open market in Awka, Anambra State, Nigeria. The plant samples were identified by a taxonomist and deposited at the Pharmacognosy and Traditional Medicine Department, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Agulu, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Anambra State, Nigeria.
Reagents
Ethanol (absolute), triethanolamine (JHD, Guangdong Guanghua Sci-Tech Co., China); chloroquine phosphate injection 40mg/ml (Labquin), Eurax cream (Novartis Corporation, Malaysia), Carbopol (Carbomer 934), carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC), potassium sorbate (Nantong Alchemy Biotech Development Co., China), Veet® hair removal cream (Reckitt Benckiser Co., UK).
Methods
Extraction of cocos nucifera water
Coconuts were randomly selected for each experiment [25]. The coconuts were de-husked to obtain coconut water which was poured into clean plastic bottles and refrigerated until needed.
Aqueous extraction of coconut milk
Coconut milk preparation, filtration, and separation was carried out according to Jasman et al. [26]. The coconut meats were grated, weighed, and blended using an electric blender (Molgold, United Kingdom). The blended meat was soaked in warm water (50 °C) at a ratio of 1:2 (coconut meat: water). The mixture was kneaded, wrapped in a muslin cloth, and then squeezed to obtain coconut milk. The extracted coconut milk was poured into a clean beaker and allowed to stand.
Centrifugation of VCO (virgin coconut oil)
This was done using a Centrifuge (80-2B, China) at a speed of 1000 rpm for 20 min. The obtained oil was passed filtered through a Whatman no 1 filter paper. The volume of oil was determined.
Pilot study of anti-pruritic effects of coconut water and coconut oil
This section of the pilot study aimed to determine the best route of administration of the pruritogen.
A total of 18 female albino rats ranging from 3-6 months old and weighing between 150-200 g were obtained from the Animal laboratory facility of the Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Nigeria, Nsukka. Animals were kept in clean cages and had free access to food and water. The rats were fed with pelletized feed (Vital Feeds, Nigeria). Also, they had 12-hour light and dark cycles. They were kept for one week to acclimatize to their new environment. The rats were divided into six (6) groups.
A pair of scissors was used to shave the napes off its fur to a diameter of about 1.5 cm. A small quantity of Veet® hair removal cream (Reckitt Benckiser Co., UK) was applied to the shaved portions and left for a minute, after which, a water-whetted cotton wool was used to rub off the area till fur-less skin was seen. The shaved rats were used for the study on the next day to allow for acclimatization, as they had a tendency to scratch the shaved portions after shaving.
The next day, the rats were given coconut fluids by oral gavage using a stainless-steel feeding needle (Harvard Apparatus, USA) inserted into a 1 ml syringe (BD, USA). The dose volume of the coconut milk, water, and oil was 20 ml/kg weight of the rat. A time interval of 15 min elapsed and then a 20 mg/kg dose of chloroquine was injected into rats through selected parenteral routes of drug administration, but the rats grouped in the oral route were given 158 mg/kg of chloroquine. Evaluation of pruritus was done by video recording of the animals, followed by visualization and counting of scratching bouts. The number of scratching bouts and distance run for each animal were registered over 30 min after the CQ challenge and the results were analyzed [27].
Determination of the anti-pruritic effects of coconut oil and water on CQ-induced itch
The was done to determine the anti-pruritic efficacy of the coconut extracts, upon topical administration. The dorsal views of the neck region of the rats were shaved as previously described. The next day, eight female Wistar rats were placed in two groups of four animals. Afterward, 0.5 ml each of coconut oil and coconut water was topically administered to the rats on the shaved portions, according to their respective groups. The rats were left for a 15-minute interval and then administered 2 mg (50 µl of 40 mg/ml) chloroquine, injected subcutaneously into the shaved portions. Evaluation of pruritus was done by video recording of the animals, followed by visualization and counting of scratching bouts as previously described [27].
Table 1. Formula for different polymer-based gels
Ingredients |
Polymer-based gel formulations |
||||||
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
F |
G |
|
Coconut water (ml) |
5 |
5 |
5 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
--- |
Coconut oil (ml) |
--- |
--- |
--- |
5 |
5 |
5 |
--- |
CMC (g) |
0.1 |
--- |
0.05 |
0.1 |
--- |
0.05 |
0.05 |
Carbopol (g) |
--- |
0.1 |
0.05 |
--- |
0.1 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
Glycerol (g) |
7.2 |
7.2 |
7.2 |
7.2 |
7.2 |
7.2 |
7.2 |
Potassium Sorbate (%) |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
Ethanol (%) |
2.4 |
2.4 |
2.4 |
2.4 |
2.4 |
2.4 |
2.4 |
Triethanolamine (qs) |
qs |
qs |
qs |
qs |
qs |
qs |
qs |
Distilled Water (ml) |
5.2 |
5.2 |
5.2 |
5.2 |
5.2 |
5.2 |
10.2 |
Key
A-Coconut water gel (CMC- based); B-Coconut water gel (Carbopol-based); C-Coconut water gel (CMC + Carbopol-based); D-Coconut oil gel (CMC-based); E-Coconut oil gel (Carbopol-based); F-Coconut oil gel (CMC + Carbopol-based); G-Plain gel
Preparation of polymer-based gels of coconut water and coconut oil
Twenty grams of seven gel formulations were prepared, (labeled A-G) according to the formula presented in Table 1. Briefly, the required quantities of CMC, glycerol, ethanol, and potassium sorbate were weighed out and placed in a mortar. Water was added and the mixture was stirred gently until the CMC dissolved. Then two drops of triethanolamine were added to enhance the gelation process of the CMC. Gentle stirring continued till a uniform mixture was obtained. The mixture was transferred to a clean and dry container and made up to the required weight. The entire procedure was repeated using carbopol and then CMC/carbopol co-polymers and also with coconut oil in place of coconut water, while a plain gel was formed without the addition of the coconut oil or water.
Characterization and stability evaluation of formulated gels
The gels formed were characterized accordingly at intervals of 7, 30, and 90 days post formulation to evaluate their stability at a temperature of (25 ± 1°C).
Organoleptic characterization
The gels were physically observed for color, appearance, clarity, consistency, and phase separation.
Determination of pH
The Digital pH meter (AVI-65, India) was used. Calibration was done using buffer solutions (pH 4 and 7). Triplicate readings were taken.
Determination of viscosity
The viscosity of the gel formulations was measured with a rotational viscometer (IIDJ-1B, China) using spindle no 5.
Comparative evaluation of the anti-pruritic activity of the formulated gels
The animals (27 Wister rats) were shaved as previously described. Subsequently, the rats were divided into nine groups of three rats per group (Groups A-I).
The rats in groups A-H were administered with the formulations above and after 15 min, 2 mg (50 ul of 40 mg/ml) of chloroquine injection was injected subcutaneously to all rats in each group. Evaluation of pruritus was done as previously described [27].
Statistical analysis
The recorded data were subjected to paired t-tests to check for statistical differences in the mean number of scratching bouts across different groups. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out to assess the relationship between the anti-pruritic reductions in the different treatment classes being tested. All the statistical analyses were computed with IBM SPSS statistics software version 23. A P value < 0.05 was considered the statistically significant cut-off.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Yield of coconut oil
The percentage (extraction) yield of coconut oil was 15.5 % v/w.
Pilot study on the anti-pruritic effects of coconut extracts
The results of the administration of the various extracts to animals were recorded in Table 2.
Table 2. Pilot study on coconut extracts
Routes of drug administration |
Scratching bouts over 30 min |
|||||
|
5 |
10 |
15 |
20 |
25 |
30 |
AI milk (SC) A2 water (SC) A3 oil (SC) |
|
** |
* |
|
|
|
BI milk (IM) B2 water (IM) B3 oil (IM) |
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
CI milk (IP) C2 water (IP) C3 oil (IP) |
|
|
* |
* |
|
|
DI milk (oral) D2 water (oral) D3 oil (oral) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
EI milk (IV) E2 water (IV) E3 oil (IV) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
F1 F2 F3 |
* * |
* * |
|
|
|
|
Key
One scratch is indicated with asterisks (*).
A - SC (Subcutaneous); B - IM (Intramuscular); C - IP (Intraperitoneal); D - O (Oral); E – IV (Intramuscular); F – Control
Evaluation of anti-pruritic effects of coconut extracts
Figure 1 shows the anti-pruritic effects of topically-administered coconut water, and coconut oil against chloroquine-induced itching over a 30-min period.
Figure 1. Anti-pruritic effects of coconut water and coconut oil |
Physical properties of coconut gel formulations
Table 3 shows the physical properties of the formulated gels. From the results, the formulations were emollient, non-greasiness, and ease removed.
Table 3. Organoleptic evaluation
S/No |
Property |
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
F |
G |
1. |
Color |
Colorless |
White |
White |
Creamy |
Creamy |
Creamy |
Colorless |
2. |
Appearance |
Transparent |
Translucent |
Translucent |
opaque |
opaque |
opaque |
Transparent |
3. |
Odor |
Nutty |
nutty |
nutty |
nutty |
nutty |
nutty |
bland |
4. |
After-feel |
Emollient |
Emollient |
Emollient |
Emol-lient |
Emollient |
Emollient |
Emollient |
5. |
Removal |
Easy |
Easy |
Easy |
Easy |
Easy |
Easy |
Easy |
6. |
Phase Separation |
Yes |
No |
no |
yes |
No |
No |
No |
7. |
Consistency |
+ |
+++ |
++ |
+ |
++ |
++ |
++ |
Key
A-Coconut water gel (CMC- based); B-Coconut water gel (Carbopol-based); C-Coconut water gel (CMC + Carbopol-based); D-Coconut oil gel (CMC-based); E-Coconut oil gel (Carbopol-based); F-Coconut oil gel (CMC + Carbopol-based); G-Plain gel; H-Eurax.
Characterization of gels
pH
The mean pH readings of the coconut-based gels over 90 days are presented in Figure 2a. The pH values obtained ranged from (7.00 ± 0.49) to (9.5 ± 0.03).
Mean viscosity
The mean viscosity values of the coconut-based gels over 90 days are presented in Figure 2b. The values obtained ranged from (201 ± 19.56) mPaS to (1890 ± 56.3) mPaS. The values of the formulations were constant, with a slight increase between days 1 and 7.
a) |
b) |
Figure 2. pH (a) and Viscosity (b) of formulations Key:A-Coconut water gel (CMC-based); B-Coconut water gel (Carbopol-based); C-Coconut water gel (CMC+ Carbopol)-based; D-Coconut oil gel (CMC-based); E-Coconut oil gel (Carbopol-based); F-Coconut oil gel (CMC + Carbopol)-based; G-Plain gel |
Stability studies of gels
The stability evaluation of the gels is presented in Table 4.
From the results of the stability test, degradation of the gel formulations occurred as changes in coloration, loss of pleasant coconut aroma (Coconut water and oil gel), and separation of the oil from the formulation (Coconut oil gel). Degradation occurred in all of the gel formulations except in the coconut oil gel containing CMC and Carbopol alongside the plain gel formulations.
Table 4. Stability studies of gels
S/No |
Property |
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
F |
G |
1. |
Appearance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Day 1 |
Colorless |
White |
white |
creamy |
Transparent |
creamy |
Colorless |
|
Day 7 |
Colorless |
White |
white |
creamy |
Transparent |
creamy |
Colorless |
|
Day 30 |
Colorless |
Pale white |
white |
creamy |
Transparent |
creamy |
Colorless |
|
Day 90 |
Colorless |
Pale white |
white |
creamy |
Transparent |
creamy |
Colorless |
|
2. |
pH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Day 1 |
9.5 |
8.0 |
8.6 |
7.7 |
8.3 |
8.0 |
8.0 |
|
Day 7 |
9.5 |
8.0 |
8.6 |
7.7 |
8.3 |
8.0 |
8.0 |
|
Day 30 |
9.0 |
8.5 |
8.1 |
6.8 |
8.4 |
8.1 |
8.0 |
|
Day 90 |
9.1 |
8.1 |
8.8 |
7.2 |
8.4 |
8.0 |
7.4 |
|
3. |
Consistency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24hrs) |
+ |
+++ |
++ |
++ |
+++ |
++ |
++ |
|
Day 7 |
+ |
+++ |
++ |
++ |
+++ |
++ |
++ |
|
Day 30 |
++ |
++ |
++ |
+ |
+++ |
++ |
+ |
|
Day 90 |
++ |
++ |
+ |
+ |
++ |
++ |
+ |
|
6. |
Phase Separation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Day 1 |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
|
Day 7 |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
|
Day 30 |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
|
Day 90 |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
Key: +++ = Good ++ = moderate + = poor
A-Coconut water gel (CMC-based); B-Coconut water gel (Carbopol-based); C-Coconut water gel (CMC+ Carbopol)-based; D-Coconut oil gel (CMC-based); E-Coconut oil gel (Carbopol-based); F-Coconut oil gel (CMC + Carbopol)-based; G-Plain gel
Anti-pruritic effects of coconut gels
Figure 3a shows the average number of scratches of different coconut gel formulations, plus their controls, against chloroquine-induced itching over a 30-minute period.
a) |
b) |
Figure 3. Anti-pruritic effects of gel formulations against chloroquine-induced itching Key: A-Coconut water gel (CMC-based); B-Coconut water gel (Carbopol-based); C-Coconut water gel (CMC+ Carbopol)-based; D-Coconut oil gel (CMC-based); E-Coconut oil gel (Carbopol-based); F-Coconut oil gel (CMC + Carbopol)-based; G-Plain gel; H-Eurax cream |
Comparison of coconut gels with Eurax® cream
Figure 3b shows the anti-pruritic comparisons between the co-polymer-based gels and the positive control, at 5-minute intervals over a 30-min period of observation.
In comparing the co-polymer-based formulations, a trend of prolonged anti-pruritic actions was observed. The combined effects of both polymers aided drug release at a sustained rate. In addition, incorporating the coconut extracts into a gel dosage form enhanced its anti-pruritic potential, in contrast to using the coconut extracts alone (Figure 1).
The results of the pilot study showed that the SC proved to be the ideal route for the administration of the pruritogen, as it resulted in a greater number of scratches. Furthermore, The SC route allows for a faster onset of action to allow for recording the incidence of itching. Coconut milk had the least anti-pruritic activity of the three coconut fluids. Pruritus in the “F” group (chloroquine alone) was seen immediately after administration. Itching was not observed in the “D” group (oral). This may be due to the relatively longer time at which chloroquine attains plasma concentration to elicit the itching effect. This agrees with Tarrasón et al. [27], concluding that oral CQ does not induce pruritus due to insufficient skin levels. Also, in agreement with previous reports, there was an absence of pruritus at higher doses of up to 100 mg/kg [28].
Tarrasón et al. [27] reported that CQ at doses ranging from 8 to 32 mg/kg induced an increased scratching response after subcutaneous administration in mice. Our report validates this claim, as the animals used in this study were treated similarly, at a dose of (20 mg/kg).
The coconut water extracted was used immediately for the assessment because of instabilities previously reported [29].
Itching bouts were observed from the onset of the injection of the pruritogen. For both coconut water and oil, itching bouts peaked at 5 min. However, the frequency of scratches in rats treated with coconut water was slightly below that observed in rats treated with coconut oil. Interestingly, both extracts exhibited similar effects from the 10th minute. During this time, there was a steep decrease in their anti-pruritic actions till the 25th minute when pruritus ceased abruptly and remained so until the 30th minute. Both extracts can be said to elicit full anti-pruritic actions, 25 minutes after the administration of chloroquine. In comparing coconut water to coconut oil, the number of scratches was higher in coconut oil. This may have been due to the presence of large-weight decanoic (capric) acid derivatives of coconut oil phytoconstituents [30]. This contradicts Krishna et al. [31] who reported that lauric acid (a constituent of coconut oil) significantly penetrates the skin and actually can accumulate in the stratum corneum. The fact that it accumulates on the skin is beneficial and may imply non-interference in the pharmacokinetics of the drug. From this study, coconut water exhibited more anti-pruritic action than coconut oil.
Fresh coconut water has a pH range of 4.2 to 6.0 and is colorless, naturally flavored, and mildly acidic. However, when aseptically extracted from the mature fruit, it has an average pH of 6.33 [32]. Formulation B was more acidic than A and C, possibly due to the influence of the carbomer as the gel former. There were variations in pH values for other treatment groups over the 90 days. Carbomers have been reported to be compatible with many active ingredients and this allows the achievement of the required pH value [33-35]. Formulation D was the most acidic of all. Although variable skin pH values are being reported in the literature, all are in the acidic range but with a broad range from pH 4.0 to 7.0 [36].
From the results of the viscosity tests, formulations B and D (Carbopol-based) had the highest viscosity values. The globules of carbomer molecules unfold into a bulk network, creating a structure formation that increases the viscosity of the system [33, 37]. The CMC-based gels had the least viscosity, while the Carbopol-based gels had the highest viscosity with good non-drip properties. The gelling agent (Carbomer 934) is highly effective in thick formulations such as viscous gels. Also, the relatively higher viscosities of the carbopol gels can be explained by the addition of triethanolamine. It was observed that the viscosity values slightly varied from day 1 to day 90. However, the least viscous formulation (D) had almost the consistency of water on day 90. This is a clear case of instability. This could also explain why formulation D had the lowest pH value (Figure 2). The use of CMC in formulating gels has been limited due to its low mechanical strength [24].
A majority of the gels exhibited pseudoplasticity. Ease of spread, sufficient skin residence time, and ease of application and collection are clinically important characteristics.
The rheological and mucoadhesive properties of a gel may give rise to a long residence time, but this is only advantageous if the drug remains in the formulation and is released throughout the complete period [38]. Also, the use of polymers will prevent the event of rancidity, especially in coconut water. In this study, formulation F was stable, effective, and sustained in action throughout observation. The effect of the dosage form is another consideration. Creams have lesser residence time on the skin, compared to gels, being largely aqueous. However, the hydrogel matrix, combined with coconut oil actives, presents a physicochemical advantage for transdermal drug delivery, in terms of skin permeability, balanced partition co-efficient, and negligible skin barriers, whilst providing a soothing, non-greasy, but emollient feel. This has implications for patient compliance.
CONCLUSION
This study has established the effectiveness of coconut oil and water formulated as gels, in managing chloroquine-induced pruritus in animal models. The result thus presents an argument for experimenting with its potent usage in humans for treating pruritis. The (Carbopol + CMC) gel matrix containing coconut oil was the most stable of all synthesized gels. This may have been due to the combined properties of both polymers and the coconut oil.
Acknowledgments: We sincerely acknowledge the efforts of Mr. Chibueze Ike, who assisted in the handling of the animals during the animal studies.
Conflict of interest: None
Financial support: None
Ethics statement: All animal experiments were carried out under the guidelines of the Animal Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria, and EU directive 2010/63/EU for animal experiments.