International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Phytopharmacological Research
ISSN (Print): 2250-1029
ISSN (Online): 2249-6084
Publish with eIJPPR Submission
2020   Volume 10   Issue 4

Epidemiology of the Urinary Stones: A 6-Year Retrospective Study at Dezful-Iran ‎

Leila Kalani1, Neda Rashidi2, Shahzad Mehranfard3, Hadi Bahrami1, Narges Majidipour4, Ali Sadeghi Moghaddam5, Leila Masoudiyekta6*

1MSc in Critical Care Nursing, School of Paramedical Sciences, Dezful University of medical sciences, Dezful, Iran.

2M.Sc In Operating Room, Department Operating Room, School of Paramedical Sciences, Dezful University of Medical Sciences, Dezful, Iran.

3MSc in Critical Care Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Dezful University of Medical Sciences, Dezful, Iran.

4Instructor of Neonatal Intensive Care Nursing, Department of Nursing, School of Nursing, Dezful University of Medical Sciences, Dezful, Iran.

5MSc in Medical-surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Dezful University of medical sciences, Dezful, Iran.

6MSc in community health nursing, school of nursing and midwifery, Dezful University of Medical Sciences, Dezful, Iran.


ABSTRACT
Introduction: The prevalence of urinary stones in different parts of the world is estimated to be in the range of 1-15% and Iran has identified as one of the "stone belt" countries with a prevalence of 2-3%. This study aimed to determine the epidemiology of urinary stones in patients referred to Ganjavian hospital at Dezful-Iran from 2010 to 2015. Materials and Methods: The study population included 519 adult patients over 15 years old with a diagnosis of urinary stone who were retrospectively assigned to the study. Data collection tools included a demographic checklist and patient biochemical tests. Results: The frequency of male and female patients was 69.6 and 30.4%, respectively. The mean age was 47.1 years. The patients’ medical history included urinary stone (43%), diabetes (18%), hypertension (29.7%), cardiac chronic disease (0.6%), hyperlipidemia (0.8%), chronic kidney disease (1%), prostatic hypertrophy (0.6%), urethral stricture (0.6%), urinary tract infection (0.6%), cyst (1.2%) and others were without underlying disease. Conclusion: Various epidemiological factors such as age, sex, hypertension, high blood sugar and history of medications are effective in getting urinary stone. So, by identifying the susceptible patients and teaching them, the burden of the disease on society and the individual can be reduced. 
Key Words: Urinary stone, Patient, epidemiology, Dezful.


INTRODUCTION

Urinary stone is one of the worldwide diseases caused by the deposition of crystals made of oxalate-calcium, phosphate calcium or uric acid in the urinary tract [1]. The prevalence of kidney stones in different parts of the world is estimated to be in the range of 1% to 15% and Iran has been identified as one of the "stone belt" countries with a prevalence of 2% to 3% [2]. Various epidemiological and demographic factors such as age, sex, ethnicity, history of previous illnesses, social class, occupation, family history, nutritional factors, education level, income status [3] hypercalciuria, hyperoxaluria, hyperuricosuria, and hypercitraturia have been identified as the predisposing factors for urinary stones [4].

Today, the morbidity of urinary stones is reduced, but its long-term complications such as the risk of recurrence of stone formation, kidney failure, and uremia can be a burden for the patients in the future [5]. Moreover, the urinary stone disease is among the painful and costly disease. Hospitalization, medical interventions and the loss of working days impose a huge economic burden on the patient. Thus controlling this situation, particularly in developing countries, which relies heavily on preventing the formation of new stones and preventing the growth of stones that were previously there, is of great importance [6]. A study by Shirazi et al. showed that identifying and educating the patients with susceptible and at-risk kidney stones, the burden of the disease can be significantly reduced on the individual and society [7]. Pieces of literature have emphasized that more studies are needed to determine the conditions and factors that increase the risk of urinary stones in a certain population. Given the contradictory results of the previous pieces of literature on the urinary stones and its related factors, this study aimed to evaluate the epidemiology of urinary stones in patients referred to as the largest teaching hospital of Dezful-Iran namely Ganjavian hospital. To our knowledge, this is the first study in this region.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study was a retrospective and cross-sectional study to determine the epidemiology of urinary stones in patients referred to our hospital from January 2010 to December 2015. According to the study by Safarinejad [8] and  

n=Z1-α/22.P(1-P)d2  formula, the sample size was estimated to be 519 individual patients. After primary coordination and approval of the university ethic committee, the researchers went to the medical records unit of the hospital and retrospectively investigate the records of patients with a definitive diagnosis of urinary stones. Each case was assigned a number from the total number of cases and according to the random number table; the samples were included in the study. The demographic data and biochemical tests of each patient were recorded. Inclusion criteria were patients over 15 years of age who given a definitive diagnosis of urinary stone disease. Records without data were excluded as incomplete.

From the patient profile, tests, and description of the operation, the following information was extracted: sex, diabetes, hypertension, urinary tract history, type of blood group, location of the stone, type of stone withdrawal procedure, Antihypertensive drugs, aspirin, and anti-diabetic use was included as well as quantitative variables including age, triglyceride levels, cholesterol levels, hypertension, and blood glucose levels. Statistical analysis was performed after transferring to the SPSS table. For descriptive statistics, mean, standard deviation and frequency distribution were used. SPSS software version 11.5 was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The mean of patients’ age, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, triglyceride, cholesterol and fasting blood sugar is summarized in Table 1. The distribution of the patients according to literacy level is shown in Figure 1. The most common disease in the patients was found to be hypertension and diabetes with a frequency of 29.7% and 18%, respectively (Figure 2). Concerning to medical history of the patients, 80.3% had a history of diabetes, 43.5% a history of anti-hypertension and 6.6% a history of aspirin use. Most of the stones were in the ureter space (Table 2). The therapy action to remove the stones were TUL (transurethral lithotripsy) (63.2%), drug therapy (11.4%), cystolitholapexy (9.4%), ureteroscopy (6.4%), nephrolithotomy (5.4%), extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (3.9%) and nephrectomy (0.4%). 35% of patients had blood group A, 35% group O, 23.8% group B and 6.3% group AB (figure 3). 92.3% had positive RH and 7.7% had negative RH (figure 4). 40.9% of renal stones were in the right kidney and ureter, 36% in left kidney and ureter, 10.9% in bilateral and 12.2% in the bladder. 55.9% had triglyceride lower than 150 (normal) mg / dl, 14.7% triglyceride 150-199 (high) mg/dl, 26.5% triglyceride 200-499 (hyper) mg/dl and 2.9% had triglycerides greater than 499 (very high) mg/dL. 63% cholesterol lower than 200 mg/dL, 25.9% cholesterol 239-200 mg/dL (borderline) and 11.1% had high cholesterol levels of 239 mg/dL. 8.5% of patients had a history of antihyperlipidemic agents and 91.5% had no history of antihypertensive drugs.

DISCUSSION

Several factors are involved in the formation of urinary stones which are discussed in our study.

The mean age of the subjects in this study was 47.1 year and the highest incidence of kidney stones was in the 4th decade of life, which is consistent with Muhbes et al [9]. Inconsistent with our study, Strob et al showed that hospitalization rates for female patients were higher than male patients (52% vs. 22%), which could be due to fluid intake, obesity, and dietary changes.

In our study, the prevalence of kidney stones in male patients was higher than female patients that may be due to males exposed to hot Khuzestan climate, family history, insufficient fluid intake, inactivity in males and dietary habits.

A study by Jaber Muhbes [9] showed that the number of male patients was more than female patients and this study is consistent with our findings. This difference may be due to anatomical differences in the urinary tract of males and females. Due to the long urethra in men, it causes stagnation and accumulation of urine in the bladder and the formation of stones.

In our study, 33.9% of the patients had primary education. This result is consistent with the Muhbes et al [9] and can be concluded that people with low literacy levels may be exposed to kidney stones due to their lack of knowledge about dietary patterns and stone-forming factors.

Our study showed that 35% of the patients had an A and O blood group. However, in the study of Rafiq Anwar and Basha [10], the incidence of kidney stones was 37%, 36%, 19% and 8% for the O, B, A, and AB blood groups, respectively. A study by Rozanski et al [11] showed that the highest rate of morbidity kidney stones is present in women with A and O blood groups in the 4th decade of life while patients with blood group B had the highest morbidity kidney stone in the 5th decade of life. In our study, the prevalence of kidney stones in patients with O and A blood groups was higher than other blood groups, so this study is consistent with our study. In the Rozanski study, there was no significant relationship between kidney stone and blood group B, whereas in our study the frequency of patients with kidney stones with blood group B was 23.8%, which is inconsistent with our study. Given the limited number of studies, cultures, and geographical regions that are related to the incidence of kidney stones and blood groups. It is recommended that this study be conducted in different populations with a high sample size. Are blood groups effective on kidney stones?

In the Jaber Muhbes study [9], there was a relationship between kidney stone and aspirin use and 35% of patients had a history of aspirin intake and in our study, patients with a history of aspirin intake were 6.6%, which is consistent with the findings of our study. A study by Shang et al [12] showed that nephrolithiasis was associated with an increased risk of hypertension and suggested that a future high-quality randomized controlled trial be conducted to clarify the relationship between nephrolithiasis and hypertension. Given that 29.7% of patients in our study had hypertension and 43.5% of patients had a history of anti-hypertension medication, our study is consistent with the Shang study. The study by Kittanamongkolchai et al [13] showed that the severity, type, and treatment of kidney stones were not associated with hypertension, which is not consistent with our study.

A study by Kang et al [14] showed that patients with kidney stones with hypertriglyceridemia had higher urinary excretion of calcium, sodium, uric acid, magnesium, and potassium. In the study, people with high cholesterol with low-density lipoprotein had higher levels of sodium, magnesium, and potassium in the urine, while those with high cholesterol with low-density lipoprotein had lower sodium excretion. Hypertriglyceridemia is independently associated with recurrence of stone. The results of the study showed that serum lipid is associated with metabolic changes in the urine. Most importantly, hypertriglyceridemia is independently associated with an increased risk of stone recurrence in patients with a kidney stone. This study is consistent with our study. These results could be used to assist patients with dyslipidemia in preventing stone formation and recurrence. Weight control and dietary interventions can be one of the preventive methods against recurrent stone formation in patients with dyslipidemia.

The study by Chung et al. [1] showed that patients with kidney stones were at increased risk of diabetes after 5 years of follow-up. The data of the Chung study confirm further research on the role of insulin resistance in kidney stone pathogenesis and underlying mechanisms. Patients with urinary tract infections may require appropriate lifestyle changes and rapid monitoring of blood sugar monitoring.

Weinberg et al.'s [15] study showed that the severity of Type 2 diabetes, as measured by glucose control and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, is an important risk factor for kidney stone disease and showed that patients with hemoglobin were more than 6.5% at risk for kidney stone.

The homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance measures insulin sensitivity in patients with Type 2 diabetes, which are among the valid parameters and suggested that further studies are needed to confirm this relationship. Hyperglycemia and glycosuria caused by diabetes are involved in the renal transport of calcium, phosphorus and uric acid. Studies showed that patients with Type 2 diabetes have increased urinary calcium and phosphorus excretion. A study by Kabeya et al [16] showed that there was no relationship between insulin resistance parameters and kidney stone risk, which is inconsistent with our study.

A history of kidney stone is associated with an increased risk of chronic kidney disease; it is hypothesized that the cumulative effects of transient renal obstruction at the time of stone passage, renal mineral deposition, and kidney side injury (extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy; laser ureteroscopy and lithotripsy) may cause nephrons and kidney function [17]. According to the study of Meschi et al. [18], there are ten rules to prevent the risk of kidney stone, including:

  1. Keep an ideal weight and take regular moderate exercise in the open air.
  2. Drink enough water to obtain a urinary volume of 2 L/d.
  3. Restrict the intake of meat and poultry proteins to about 20 g/d.
  4. Eat about 40 g of plant protein a day.
  5. Eat fruits and vegetables every day, avoiding products rich in oxalate.
  6. Eat milk and dairy products to achieve a calcium intake of about 1000 mg/d.
  7. Follow the international guidelines on fat and carbohydrate consumption.
  8. Use fresh and frozen food products, avoiding precooked and/or preserved foods.
  9. Avoid do-it-yourself use of supplements and only take medicines and supplements under medical supervision.
  10. Try to avoid stressful life events as far as possible.

Suggestion:

It is recommended that further studies be conducted in a cohort with a high sample size to establish the relationship between kidney stones and related factors.

Limitations:

Patient records, diet, lifestyle, occupation, type of medication used, stone type analysis, BMI and biochemical tests had not been fully listed.

CONCLUSION:

Various epidemiological factors such as age, sex, hypertension, high blood sugar and history of medications are effective in getting urinary stone. So, by identifying the susceptible patients and teaching them, the burden of the disease on society and the individual can be reduced.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

This article was derived from a Research project with ethics code IR.DUMS.REC.1396.13 in Dezful University of Medical Sciences,

Financial support and sponsorship

Deputy of research and technology of Dezful University of Medical Sciences

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

 

  1. Chung SD, Chen YK, Lin HC. Increased risk of diabetes in patients with urinary calculi: a 5-year followup study. The Journal of urology. 2011 Nov;186(5):1888-93.
  2. Akhavan Sepahi M, Sharifian M, Shajari A, Heidary A. Clinical manifestations and etiology of renal and urethra stone in children less than 14 years old referring to Fatemi-e-Sahamieh pediatric hospital in Qom, 2007-2008. J Arak Uni Med Sci. 2009; 12 (3) :1-7.
  3. Saint-Elie DT, Patel PV, Healy KA, Solomon T, Pattaras JG, Qian J, Master VA, Ogan K. The impact of income and education on dietary habits in stone formers. Urology. 2010 Aug 1;76(2):307-13.
  4. Lee SC, Kim YJ, Kim TH, Yun SJ, Lee NK, Kim WJ. Impact of obesity in patients with urolithiasis and its prognostic usefulness in stone recurrence. The Journal of urology. 2008 Feb 1;179(2):570-4.
  5. Smith DR, Tanagho EA, McAninch JW. Smith's general urology: Lange Medical Books/McGraw-Hill; 2008.
  6. Mohkam M, Mahani F, Otoukesh B, Sharifian M, Dalirani R, Hatamian B, Gorgi FA. Epidemiology of urolithiasis among children hospitalized in Mofid hospital during 5 years. Pejouhandeh. 2010;15(3):133-36
  7. Shirazi F, Shahpourian F, Khachian A, Hoseini AF, Heidari S. The relationship of epidemiologic and demographic factors with urinary Stones. Iran Journal of Nursing. 2010 Oct;23(66):73-80.
  8. Safarinejad MR. Adult urolithiasis in a population-based study in Iran: prevalence, incidence, and associated risk factors. Urological research. 2007 Apr 1;35(2):73-82.
  9. Muhbes FJ. Risk factors for renal stone formation: A field study. Health Science Journal. 2012 Oct 1;6(4):714-25
  10. Rafiq Anwar A, AhamedBasha A. Correlation between ABO/Rh Blood Groups with the incidence of renal calculi. Indian Journal of Basic and Applied Medical Research. 2016;5(2):387-92.
  11. Różański W, Miękoś E, Monita W, Pietraszun R. Distribution of blood groups of the AB0 system in patients with urolithiasis. International Urology and Nephrology. 1983 Dec 1;15(4):303-7.
  12. Weifeng Sh, Yuanyuan Li, Yali Ren, Yi Yang, Hua Li, and Junwu D. Nephrolithiasis and risk of hypertension: a meta-analysis of observational studies. BMC Nephrology .2017 ;183(44): 1-6.
  13. Kittanamongkolchai W, Mara KC, Mehta RA, Vaughan LE, Denic A, Knoedler JJ, Enders FT, Lieske JC, Rule AD. Risk of hypertension among first-time symptomatic kidney stone formers. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2017 Mar 7;12(3):476-82.
  14. Kang HW, Seo SP, Kim WT, Kim YJ, Yun SJ, Lee SC, Kim WJ. Hypertriglyceridemia is associated with increased risk for stone recurrence in patients with urolithiasis. Urology. 2014 Oct 1;84(4):766-71.
  15. Weinberg AE, Patel CJ, Chertow GM, Leppert JT. Diabetic severity and risk of kidney stone disease. European urology. 2014 Jan 1;65(1):242-7.
  16. Kabeya Y, Kato K, Tomita M, Katsuki T, Oikawa Y, Shimada A, Atsumi Y. Associations of insulin resistance and glycemic control with the risk of kidney stones. Internal Medicine. 2012;51(7):699-705.
  17. Shoag J, Halpern J, Goldfarb DS, Eisner BH. Risk of chronic and end stage kidney disease in patients with nephrolithiasis. The Journal of urology. 2014 Nov 1;192(5):1440-5.
  18. Meschi T, Nouvenne A, Borghi L. Lifestyle recommendations to reduce the risk of kidney stones. Urologic Clinics. 2011 Aug 1;38(3):313-20.

 

 

Table 1: The mean and standard deviation of the age, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, triglyceride, cholesterol and fasting blood sugar according to patients' sex

Patients sex

Number

Age

Systolic Blood Pressure

Diastolic Blood Pressure

Triglyceride

Cholesterol

Fasting Blood Sugar

Males

361

47±17

129±21

77±11

183±138

176±55

108±41

Females

158

45±18

128±19

74±12

184±136

177±54

107±40

 

Table 2: Frequency Distribution of stone space

Space

Frequency

Percent

kidney

89

17.1

ureter

368

70.9

bladder

62

11.9

Total

519

100.0

 

Figure 1: Frequency Distribution of the patients according to literacy level

Figure 2: frequency Distribution of the comorbid' diseases

figure 3: frequency distribution analysis of ABO in renal calculi patients

 

Figure 4: frequency distribution analysis of RH in renal calculi patients

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Phytopharmacological Research
© 2024 All rights reserved